Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Minnesota loses first round against Kalshi, Polymarket

    August 3, 2026

    Hyperliquid has some growing to do before it can take on Binance

    August 3, 2026

    Scalability, Part 3: On Metacoin History and Multichain

    August 3, 2026
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Block Hub News
    • Lithosphere News Releases
    • Crypto
    • Ethereum
    • Bitcoin
      • Litecoin
      • Altcoins
      • Coinbase
    • Blockchain
    Block Hub News
    Home » Crypto PAC spending tops $2M in Michigan House race
    Crypto

    Crypto PAC spending tops $2M in Michigan House race

    James WilsonBy James WilsonAugust 2, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link



    A crypto industry-aligned political action committee has pushed its spending above $2 million in Michigan’s 13th Congressional District, according to final-week Federal Election Commission disclosures. 

    Summary

    • Protect Progress spending surpassed $2 million backing Thanedar and opposing McKinney before Tuesday’s primary vote.
    • $884,240 in new advertisements supported Thanedar, while more than $150,000 targeted McKinney with opposition messaging.
    • August 4 voters will decide the Democratic nominee after over one million Michiganders voted early.

    Protect Progress is supporting Democratic incumbent Shri Thanedar and opposing challenger Donavan McKinney before the Aug. 4 primary.

    Protect Progress is affiliated with the Fairshake network, which has received major funding from companies including Coinbase and Ripple. The latest filings added $884,240 in media supporting Thanedar and more than $150,000 in spending against McKinney. The additions effectively doubled the amount reported about a week earlier.

    Crypto PAC spending tops $2M before Michigan vote

    Protect Progress is registered with the FEC as an active independent expenditure-only committee, commonly called a super PAC. Its spending supports or opposes candidates but does not represent money transferred directly to their campaigns. The latest expenditure notices are available through the committee’s official FEC filings.

    The committee’s processed FEC summary may not immediately show every last-minute purchase. The agency states that its independent expenditure table excludes separate 24-hour and 48-hour notices, which committees use to disclose spending close to an election. One of the latest Michigan notices was filed through this FEC disclosure.

    The scale is notable beside the candidates’ own finances. McKinney’s campaign reported $1.23 million in total disbursements through July 15. Protect Progress’s outside spending has exceeded that amount, although the figures cover different reporting periods and forms of political activity.

    Thanedar’s crypto votes drew industry support

    Thanedar voted for the stablecoin-focused GENIUS Act and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in the House. In an official statement, he described the measures as steps toward clearer rules, consumer safeguards and wider financial access, while acknowledging that the bills were “not perfect.”

    The House-approved CLARITY Act remains under consideration in the Senate. Protect Progress has not stated in its FEC notices that any specific vote caused its spending decision. However, the committee generally supports candidates viewed as favorable toward digital asset legislation.

    As previously reported, Protect Progress had disclosed more than $986,000 in Michigan spending by July 23. The latest filings pushed the total above $2 million during the final two weeks of the primary.

    McKinney makes the spending a campaign issue

    McKinney has used the outside funding to criticize Thanedar’s crypto policy record. In a July 21 statement, he alleged that “the crypto lobby is paying my opponent back” for votes that benefited President Donald Trump’s digital asset interests.

    That statement represents a campaign allegation. FEC records confirm that Protect Progress paid for independent advertisements, but they do not establish McKinney’s claimed motive or demonstrate coordination with Thanedar’s campaign. Federal rules require super PAC expenditures to remain independent of supported candidates.

    The Michigan spending forms part of a broader national strategy by Fairshake and its affiliates. Public Citizen estimated that crypto companies had supplied about $189 million during the 2026 election cycle, with Fairshake-linked groups accounting for more than $82 million in expenditures. Those totals represent the watchdog’s analysis rather than an FEC finding that every dollar came from one industry source.

    Aug. 4 result will test the spending strategy

    Michigan voters will choose the Democratic nominee on Tuesday, Aug. 4. More than 1.03 million residents had voted by the morning of July 31, according to the Michigan Department of State. Statewide early voting continued through Aug. 2, with some jurisdictions offering voting on Aug. 3. Completed absentee ballots must arrive by 8 p.m. on election day.

    The result will offer a near-term test of whether Protect Progress’s final advertising surge helped Thanedar. However, it will not prove that PAC spending alone determined the outcome because turnout, candidate organizations and local concerns also shape congressional elections.

    Additional FEC notices or amendments may appear after voting ends. The official canvass will confirm the nominee, while later campaign-finance reports should provide a fuller account of the committee’s total Michigan spending. No verified crypto market reaction has been tied to the race.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    James Wilson

    Related Posts

    Minnesota loses first round against Kalshi, Polymarket

    August 3, 2026

    Bitcoin ETFs gain fresh case after $89M Coldcard drain

    August 2, 2026

    Coldcard users face urgent seed migration warning

    August 2, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Demo
    Top Posts

    Stablecoins, Base and ‘everything exchange’: a look inside Coinbase’s strategy to expand in 2026

    June 3, 2026

    Dimon’s clarity act criticism sparks fierce response from Sen. Lummis

    June 3, 2026

    Who regulates prediction markets? Coinbase forces a US legal test

    June 3, 2026

    Coinbase links raise questions around crypto lobby’s clarity push

    June 3, 2026
    Don't Miss

    Minnesota loses first round against Kalshi, Polymarket

    By James WilsonAugust 3, 2026

    Minnesota’s prediction market ban remained blocked on Aug. 2, one day after the law was…

    Hyperliquid has some growing to do before it can take on Binance

    August 3, 2026

    Scalability, Part 3: On Metacoin History and Multichain

    August 3, 2026

    Bitcoin ETFs gain fresh case after $89M Coldcard drain

    August 2, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    Demo
    X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Our Picks

    Minnesota loses first round against Kalshi, Polymarket

    August 3, 2026

    Hyperliquid has some growing to do before it can take on Binance

    August 3, 2026

    Scalability, Part 3: On Metacoin History and Multichain

    August 3, 2026
    Most Popular

    Stablecoins, Base and ‘everything exchange’: a look inside Coinbase’s strategy to expand in 2026

    June 3, 2026

    Dimon’s clarity act criticism sparks fierce response from Sen. Lummis

    June 3, 2026

    Who regulates prediction markets? Coinbase forces a US legal test

    June 3, 2026

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.